Sec. 19. The director may institute an action necessary to enforce compliance with this act, a rule promulgated under this act, or a marketing agreement or program adopted under this act and committed to his or her administration. In addition to any other remedy provided by law, the director may apply for relief by injunction to protect the public interest without being compelled to allege or prove that an adequate remedy at law does not exist. The application may be made to a court of competent jurisdiction.
Mich. Comp. Laws § 290.669
Action to enforce compliance; injunction; jurisdiction
Applied in 3 court decisions — leading case Department of Agriculture v. Appletree Marketing, LLC (2010)
Most recently applied in Department of Agriculture v. Appletree Marketing, LLC (March 2010)
1965, Act 232, Eff
How often courts cite this section
Court decisions citing this, by year. The dip in the last several years is a data-coverage gap, not a real trend — our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so recent citations are undercounted.
Official source: Michigan Legislature. Reproduced from public-domain Michigan statutes; confirm against the official source for the current text. Not legal advice.