Sec. 3. (1) Actual or threatened misappropriation may be enjoined. Upon application to the court of competent jurisdiction, an injunction shall be terminated when the trade secret has ceased to exist, but the injunction may be continued for an additional reasonable period of time in order to eliminate commercial advantage that otherwise would be derived from the misappropriation. (2) If a court determines that it would be unreasonable to prohibit future use of a trade secret, an injunction may condition future use upon payment of a reasonable royalty for no longer than the period of time the use could have been prohibited. (3) In appropriate circumstances, affirmative acts to protect a trade secret may be compelled by court order.
Mich. Comp. Laws § 445.1903
Misappropriation; injunction
Applied in 9 court decisions — leading case 251 Mich. App. 125 - CMI International, Inc. v. Intermet International Corp. (2002)
Most recently applied in Radiant Global Logistics, Inc. v. Furstenau (February 2019)
1998, Act 448, Imd
How often courts cite this section
Court decisions citing this, by year. The dip in the last several years is a data-coverage gap, not a real trend — our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so recent citations are undercounted.
Official source: Michigan Legislature. Reproduced from public-domain Michigan statutes; confirm against the official source for the current text. Not legal advice.