Minn. Stat. § 14.69

SCOPE OF JUDICIAL REVIEW.

Known as the Administrative Procedure Act

The act spans §§ 14–14 (73 sections).

Applied in 337 court decisions — leading case Frost-Benco Electric Ass'n v. Minnesota Public Utilities Commission (1984)

Most recently applied in City of Eden Prairie v. Travis R. Serafin, Relator, Public Employees Retirement Association, ... (April 2024)

1963 c 809 s 2; 1980 c 615 s 22; 1982 c 424 s 130

How often courts cite this section

citing decisions per year

Court decisions citing this, by year. The dip in the last several years is a data-coverage gap, not a real trend — our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so recent citations are undercounted.

In a judicial review under sections 14.63 to 14.68 , the court may affirm the decision of the agency or remand the case for further proceedings; or it may reverse or modify the decision if the substantial rights of the petitioners may have been prejudiced because the administrative finding, inferences, conclusion, or decisions are:

(a) in violation of constitutional provisions; or

(b) in excess of the statutory authority or jurisdiction of the agency; or

(d) affected by other error of law; or

(e) unsupported by substantial evidence in view of the entire record as submitted; or

(f) arbitrary or capricious.

Official source: Minnesota Office of the Revisor of Statutes. Reproduced from public-domain Minnesota statutes; confirm against the official source for the current text. Not legal advice.