Any person, any governmental body, or the state of Minnesota or any of its subdivisions or agencies, injured directly or indirectly by a violation of sections 325D.49 to 325D.66 , shall recover three times the actual damages sustained, together with costs and disbursements, including reasonable attorneys' fees. In any subsequent action arising from the same conduct, the court may take any steps necessary to avoid duplicative recovery against a defendant.
Minn. Stat. § 325D.57
DAMAGES.
Known as the Minnesota Antitrust Law
The act spans §§ 325–325 (18 sections).
Applied in 32 court decisions — leading case California v. Arc America Corp. (1989)
Most recently applied in Karen Stromberg v. Qualcomm Inc. (September 2021)
1971 c 865 s 9; 1984 c 458 s 1
How often courts cite this section
Court decisions citing this, by year. The dip in the last several years is a data-coverage gap, not a real trend — our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so recent citations are undercounted.
Official source: Minnesota Office of the Revisor of Statutes. Reproduced from public-domain Minnesota statutes; confirm against the official source for the current text. Not legal advice.