A term of a dealership agreement either expressed or implied, including a choice of law provision, that is inconsistent with the terms of sections 325E.068 to 325E.0684 or that purports to waive an equipment manufacturer's compliance with sections 325E.068 to 325E.0684 is void and unenforceable and does not waive any rights that are provided to a person by sections 325E.068 to 325E.0684 .
Minn. Stat. § 325E.0683
STATUS OF INCONSISTENT AGREEMENTS.
Applied in 2 court decisions — leading case Minnesota Supply Co. v. Mitsubishi Caterpillar Forklift America Inc. (2011)
Most recently applied in Minnesota Supply Co. v. Mitsubishi Caterpillar Forklift America Inc. (September 2011)
1989 c 267 s 4; 1991 c 70 s 10
Official source: Minnesota Office of the Revisor of Statutes. Reproduced from public-domain Minnesota statutes; confirm against the official source for the current text. Not legal advice.