Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

Minn. Stat. § 327C.10

DEFENSES TO EVICTION.

Applied in 1 court decision — leading case Skyline Village Park Ass'n v. Skyline Village L.P. (2010)

Most recently applied in Skyline Village Park Ass'n v. Skyline Village L.P. (July 2010)

1982 c 526 art 2 s 10; 1999 c 199 art 2 s 12

Subdivision 1. Nonpayment of rent.

In any action to recover possession for failure to pay rent, it shall be a defense that the sum allegedly due contains a charge which violates section 327C.03 , or that the park owner has injured the defendant by failing to comply with section 504B.161 .

Subd. 2. Nonpayment of rent increase.

In any action to recover possession for failure to pay a rent increase, it shall be a defense that the park owner:

(1) failed to comply with the provisions of section 327C.06, subdivision 1 or 3;

(2) increased the rent in violation of section 327C.06, subdivision 2 .

Subd. 3. Rule violations.

In any action to recover possession for the violation of a park rule, it shall be a defense that the rule allegedly violated is unreasonable.

Subd. 4. Retaliatory conduct.

In any action to recover possession it shall be a defense that the park owner has violated section 327C.12 .

Official source: Minnesota Office of the Revisor of Statutes. Reproduced from public-domain Minnesota statutes; confirm against the official source for the current text. Not legal advice.