Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

Minn. Stat. § 462.361

JUDICIAL REVIEW.

Known as the Regional Development Act

The act spans §§ 462–462 (52 sections).

Applied in 27 court decisions — leading case Interstate Power Co. v. Nobles County Board of Commissioners (2000)

Most recently applied in Schulz v. Town of Duluth (February 2019)

1965 c 670 s 11; 1986 c 444

How often courts cite this section

1986199020002010201940
citing decisions per year

Court decisions citing this, by year. The dip in the last several years is a data-coverage gap, not a real trend — our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so recent citations are undercounted.

Subdivision 1. Review of action.

Any person aggrieved by an ordinance, rule, regulation, decision or order of a governing body or board of adjustments and appeals acting pursuant to sections 462.351 to 462.364 may have such ordinance, rule, regulation, decision or order, reviewed by an appropriate remedy in the district court, subject to the provisions of this section.

Subd. 2. Exhaustion of remedies.

In actions brought under this section, a municipality may raise as a defense the fact that the complaining party has not attempted to remedy the grievance by use of procedures available for that purpose under ordinance or charter, or under sections 462.351 to 462.364 . If the court finds that such remedies have not been exhausted, it shall require the complaining party to pursue those remedies unless it finds that the use of such remedies would serve no useful purpose under the circumstances of the case.

Official source: Minnesota Office of the Revisor of Statutes. Reproduced from public-domain Minnesota statutes; confirm against the official source for the current text. Not legal advice.