Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

Minn. Stat. § 518A.37

WRITTEN FINDINGS.

Applied in 3 court decisions — leading case Marriage of Hesse v. Hesse (2009)

Most recently applied in In re the Matter of: Dakota County, Lorinda Elaine Floding, Below v. Darrell Ray Gillespie (July 2015)

2005 c 164 s 18,29; 1Sp2005 c 7 s 28; 2006 c 280 s 29

How often courts cite this section

20092010201510
citing decisions per year

Court decisions citing this, by year. The dip in the last several years is a data-coverage gap, not a real trend — our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so recent citations are undercounted.

Subdivision 1. No deviation.

If the court does not deviate from the presumptive child support obligation computed under section 518A.34 , the court must make written findings that state:

(1) each parent's gross income;

(2) each parent's PICS; and

(3) any other significant evidentiary factors affecting the child support determination.

Subd. 2. Deviation.

If the court deviates from the presumptive child support obligation computed under section 518A.34 , the court must make written findings that state:

(1) each parent's gross income;

(2) each parent's PICS;

(3) the amount of the child support obligation computed under section 518A.34 ;

(4) the reasons for the deviation; and

(5) how the deviation serves the best interests of the child.

Subd. 3. Written findings required in every case.

The provisions of this section apply whether or not the parties are each represented by independent counsel and have entered into a written agreement. The court must review stipulations presented to it for conformity with section 518A.34 . The court is not required to conduct a hearing, but the parties must provide sufficient documentation to verify the child support determination and to justify any deviation.

Official source: Minnesota Office of the Revisor of Statutes. Reproduced from public-domain Minnesota statutes; confirm against the official source for the current text. Not legal advice.