Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

Minn. Stat. § 518C.204

SIMULTANEOUS PROCEEDINGS IN ANOTHER STATE OR FOREIGN COUNTRY.

Known as the Uniform Interstate Family Support Act

The act spans §§ 518–518 (77 sections).

Applied in 2 court decisions — leading case Kasdan v. Berney (1999)

Most recently applied in 2012 OK CIV APP 26 - Hanger v. Hanger (November 2011)

1994 c 630 art 2 s 4; 2014 c 189 s 8,73; 2015 c 71 art 1 s 119

(a) A tribunal of this state may exercise jurisdiction to establish a support order if the petition or comparable pleading is filed after a petition or comparable pleading is filed in another state or a foreign country only if:

(1) the petition or comparable pleading in this state is filed before the expiration of the time allowed in the other state or the foreign country for filing a responsive pleading challenging the exercise of jurisdiction by the other state or the foreign country;

(2) the contesting party timely challenges the exercise of jurisdiction in the other state or the foreign country; and

(3) if relevant, this state is the home state of the child.

(b) A tribunal of this state may not exercise jurisdiction to establish a support order if the petition or comparable pleading is filed before a petition or comparable pleading is filed in another state or a foreign country if:

(1) the petition or comparable pleading in the other state or foreign country is filed before the expiration of the time allowed in this state for filing a responsive pleading challenging the exercise of jurisdiction by this state;

(2) the contesting party timely challenges the exercise of jurisdiction in this state; and

(3) if relevant, the other state or foreign country is the home state of the child.

Official source: Minnesota Office of the Revisor of Statutes. Reproduced from public-domain Minnesota statutes; confirm against the official source for the current text. Not legal advice.