Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

Minn. Stat. § 518C.613

JURISDICTION TO MODIFY SUPPORT ORDER OF ANOTHER STATE WHEN INDIVIDUAL PARTIES RESIDE IN THIS STATE.

Known as the Uniform Interstate Family Support Act

The act spans §§ 518C.101 to 518C.905 (77 sections).

Applied in 2 court decisions — leading case Hennepin County v. Hill (2010)

Most recently applied in Hennepin County v. Hill (January 2010)

1997 c 203 art 6 s 69; 2014 c 189 s 52,73; 2014 c 275 art 1 s 125; 2015 c 71 art 1 s 118,119

(a) If all of the parties who are individuals reside in this state and the child does not reside in the issuing state, a tribunal of this state has jurisdiction to enforce and to modify the issuing state's child support order in a proceeding to register that order.

(b) A tribunal of this state exercising jurisdiction as provided in this section shall apply sections 518C.101 to 518C.211 and 518C.601 to 518C.616 to the enforcement or modification proceeding. Sections 518C.301 to 518C.508 and 518C.701 to 518C.802 do not apply and the tribunal shall apply the procedural and substantive law of this state.

Official source: Minnesota Office of the Revisor of Statutes. Reproduced from public-domain Minnesota statutes; confirm against the official source for the current text. Not legal advice.