Except where the Uniform Commercial Code otherwise prescribes, if judgment be recovered by plaintiff in an action begun within the prescribed period of limitation and such judgment be afterward arrested or reversed on error or appeal, the plaintiff may begin a new action within one year after such reversal or arrest.
Minn. Stat. § 541.18
NEW ACTION IN CASE OF REVERSAL.
Known as the Uniform Conflict of Laws-Limitations Act
The act spans §§ 541–541 (36 sections).
Applied in 5 court decisions — leading case Kulinski v. Medtronic Bio-Medicus, Inc. (1997)
Most recently applied in Goodman v. Best Buy, Inc. (September 2008)
(9205) RL s 4087; 1965 c 812 s 22
How often courts cite this section
Court decisions citing this, by year. The dip in the last several years is a data-coverage gap, not a real trend — our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so recent citations are undercounted.
Official source: Minnesota Office of the Revisor of Statutes. Reproduced from public-domain Minnesota statutes; confirm against the official source for the current text. Not legal advice.