The writ of mandamus is either alternative or peremptory. The alternative writ shall state concisely the facts showing the obligation of the defendant to perform the act, and the defendant's omission so to do, and command the defendant that immediately after the receipt of a copy of the writ, or at some other specified time, the defendant do the required act, or show cause before the court out of which the writ issued, at a specified time and place, why the defendant has not done so, and that the defendant then and there make a return to the writ, with a certificate thereon of having done as commanded. The peremptory writ shall be in similar form, except that the words requiring defendant to show cause shall be omitted.
Minn. Stat. § 586.03
ALTERNATIVE OR PEREMPTORY WRIT, CONTENTS.
Applied in 6 court decisions — leading case Northern States Power Co. v. Minnesota Metropolitan Council (2004)
Most recently applied in Tokvan Ly v. Jodi Harpstead, Minnesota Commissioner of Human Services (June 2024)
(9724) RL s 4558; 1986 c 444
How often courts cite this section
Court decisions citing this, by year. The dip in the last several years is a data-coverage gap, not a real trend — our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so recent citations are undercounted.
Official source: Minnesota Office of the Revisor of Statutes. Reproduced from public-domain Minnesota statutes; confirm against the official source for the current text. Not legal advice.