Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

Minn. Stat. § 595.025

DEFAMATION.

Known as the Minnesota Free Flow of Information Act

The act spans §§ 595–595 (10 sections).

Applied in 5 court decisions — leading case Weinberger v. Maplewood Review (2003)

Most recently applied in Energy Transfer LP (formerly known as Energy Transfer Equity, L.P.) v. Greenpeace International ... (May 2024)

1973 c 735 s 5; 1983 c 247 s 205

How often courts cite this section

1997200020102020202410
citing decisions per year

Court decisions citing this, by year. The dip in the last several years is a data-coverage gap, not a real trend — our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so recent citations are undercounted.

Subdivision 1. Disclosure prohibition; applicability.

The prohibition of disclosure provided in section 595.023 shall not apply in any defamation action where the person seeking disclosure can demonstrate that the identity of the source will lead to relevant evidence on the issue of actual malice.

Subd. 2. Disclosure conditions.

Notwithstanding the provisions of subdivision 1, the identity of the source of information shall not be ordered disclosed unless the following conditions are met:

(a) that there is probable cause to believe that the source has information clearly relevant to the issue of defamation;

(b) that the information cannot be obtained by any alternative means or remedy less destructive of first amendment rights.

Subd. 3. Determination; appeal.

The court shall make its order on the issue of disclosure after making findings of fact, which order may be appealed to the court of appeals according to the Rules of Appellate Procedure. During the appeal the order is stayed and nondisclosure shall remain in full force and effect.

Official source: Minnesota Office of the Revisor of Statutes. Reproduced from public-domain Minnesota statutes; confirm against the official source for the current text. Not legal advice.