Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

Miss. Code Ann. § 75-4-103

Variation by agreement; measure of damages; action constituting ordinary care

Known as the Uniform Commercial Code

The act spans §§ 75–75 (480 sections).

Applied in 8 court decisions — leading case White v. Hancock Bank (1985)

Most recently applied in 269 So. 3d 19 - Marilyn Newsome v. Peoples Bank (October 2018)

Codes, 1942, § 41A:4-103; Laws, 1966, ch. 316, § 4-103; Laws, 1992, ch. 420, § 74, eff from and after January 1, 1993.

How often courts cite this section

1985199020002010201810
citing decisions per year

Court decisions citing this, by year. The dip in the last several years is a data-coverage gap, not a real trend — our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so recent citations are undercounted.

The effect of the provisions of this chapter may be varied by agreement, but the parties to the agreement cannot disclaim a bank’s responsibility for its lack of good faith or failure to exercise ordinary care or limit the measure of damages for the lack or failure. However, the parties may determine by agreement the standards by which the bank’s responsibility is to be measured if those standards are not manifestly unreasonable.

Federal Reserve regulations and operating circulars, clearinghouse rules, and the like have the effect of agreements under subsection (a), whether or not specifically assented to by all parties interested in items handled.

Action or non-action approved by this chapter or pursuant to Federal Reserve regulations or operating circulars is the exercise of ordinary care and, in the absence of special instructions, action or non-action consistent with clearinghouse rules and the like or with a general banking usage not disapproved by this chapter, is prima facie the exercise of ordinary care.

The specification or approval of certain procedures by this chapter is not disapproval of other procedures that may be reasonable under the circumstances.

The measure of damages for failure to exercise ordinary care in handling an item is the amount of the item reduced by an amount that could not have been realized by the exercise of ordinary care. If there is also bad faith it includes any other damages the party suffered as a proximate consequence.

Current official text: Mississippi Code (LexisNexis). Digitized from the UniCourt Code Improvement Commission public-domain capture. Reproduced from public-domain Mississippi statutes; confirm against the official source for the current text. Not legal advice.