Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

Miss. Code Ann. § 97-37-9

Deadly weapons; defenses against indictment for carrying deadly weapon

Applied in 3 court decisions — leading case 634 So. 2d 524 - Duvall v. State (1994)

Most recently applied in 745 So. 2d 850 - Booker v. State (December 1998)

Codes, 1892, § 1027; 1906, § 1105; Hemingway’s 1917, § 831; 1930, § 855; 1942, § 2081; Laws, 1912, ch. 210; Laws, 1960, ch. 242, § 2; Laws, 1962, ch. 310, § 2; Laws, 1974, ch. 3…

How often courts cite this section

1992199810
citing decisions per year

Court decisions citing this, by year. The dip in the last several years is a data-coverage gap, not a real trend — our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so recent citations are undercounted.

Any person indicted or charged for a violation of Section 97-37-1 may show as a defense:

That he was threatened, and had good and sufficient reason to apprehend a serious attack from any enemy, and that he did so apprehend; or

That he was traveling and was not a tramp, or was setting out on a journey and was not a tramp; or

That he was a law enforcement or peace officer in the discharge of his duties; or

That he was at the time in the discharge of his duties as a mail carrier; or

That he was at the time engaged in transporting valuables for an express company or bank; or

That he was a member of the Armed Forces of the United States, National Guard, State Militia, Emergency Management Corps, guard or patrolman in a state or municipal institution while in the performance of his official duties; or

That he was in lawful pursuit of a felon; or

That he was lawfully engaged in legitimate sports;

That at the time he was a company guard, bank guard, watchman, or other person enumerated in Section 97-37-7, and was then actually engaged in the performance of his duties as such, and then held a valid permit from the sheriff, the commissioner of public safety, or a valid permit issued by the Secretary of State prior to May 1, 1974, to carry the weapon; and the burden of proving either of said defenses shall be on the accused; or

That at the time he or she was a member of a church or place of worship security program, and was then actually engaged in the performance of his or her duties as such and met the requirements of Section 45-9-171.

Current official text: Mississippi Code (LexisNexis). Digitized from the UniCourt Code Improvement Commission public-domain capture. Reproduced from public-domain Mississippi statutes; confirm against the official source for the current text. Not legal advice.