In any action or prosecution under this chapter, the courts may be guided by interpretations of the United States' antitrust laws.
N.H. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 356:14
Interpretation of Statute
Applied in 3 court decisions — leading case U.S. Healthcare, Inc. v. Healthsource, Inc. (1993)
Most recently applied in In re Keurig Green Mountain Single-Serve Coffee Antitrust Litig. (April 2019)
Source. 1973, 434:2, eff
How often courts cite this section
Court decisions citing this, by year. The dip in the last several years is a data-coverage gap, not a real trend — our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so recent citations are undercounted.
Official source: New Hampshire General Court. Reproduced from public-domain New Hampshire statutes; confirm against the official source for the current text. Not legal advice.