Lack of privity shall not be a defense in any action brought against the manufacturer, seller or supplier of goods to recover damages for breach of warranty, express or implied, or for negligence, even though the plaintiff did not purchase the goods from the defendant, if the plaintiff was a person whom the manufacturer, seller or supplier might reasonably have expected to use, consume or be affected by the goods. A manufacturer, seller, or supplier may not exclude or limit the operation of this section.
N.H. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 382-A:2-318
Actions or Warranties Against Manufacturers, Sellers, or Suppliers of Goods
Known as the Uniform Commercial Code
The act spans §§ 382-A:1-101 to 382-A:9-809 (637 sections).
Applied in 1 court decision — leading case Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. Nishika Ltd. (1997)
Most recently applied in Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. Nishika Ltd. (June 1997)
Source. 1959, 247:1. 1973, 568:2, eff
Official source: New Hampshire General Court. Reproduced from public-domain New Hampshire statutes; confirm against the official source for the current text. Not legal advice.