Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

N.J. Stat. Ann. § 2C:21-8.1

Definition; determination of degree of offense

Known as the September 11th, 2001 Anti-Terrorism Act

The act spans §§ 2–2 (912 sections).

Applied in 1 court decision — leading case 106 F. Supp. 2d 761 - Pharmaceutical Sales and Consulting Corp. v. JWS Delavau Co., Inc. (2000)

Most recently applied in 106 F. Supp. 2d 761 - Pharmaceutical Sales and Consulting Corp. v. JWS Delavau Co., Inc. (July 2000)

L.1981, c. 290, s. 23, eff

a. As used in chapter 21, unless a different meaning plainly is required:

"Benefit derived" means the loss resulting from the offense or any gain or advantage to the actor, or coconspirators, or any person in whom the actor is interested, whichever is greater, whether loss, gain or advantage takes the form of money, property, commercial interests or anything else the primary significance of which is economic gain.

b. The benefit derived or resulting harm in violation of chapter 21 shall be determined by the trier of fact. The benefit derived or resulting harm pursuant to one scheme or course of conduct, whether in relation to the same person or several persons, may be aggregated in determining the degree of the offense.

Current official text: New Jersey Legislature. Digitized from the New Jersey Legislature bulk statutes download. Reproduced from public-domain New Jersey statutes; confirm against the official source for the current text. Not legal advice.