Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

§ 55-2-720 NMSA 1978

Effect of "cancellation" or "rescission" on claims for antecedent breach

Known as the Uniform Commercial Code

The act spans §§ 55–55 (591 sections).

1953 Comp., § 50A-2-720, enacted by Laws 1961, ch. 96, § 2-720.

Unless the contrary intention clearly appears, expressions of "cancellation" or "rescission" of the contract or the like shall not be construed as a renunciation or discharge of any claim in damages for an antecedent breach.

UCC Official Comments © by ALI & the NCCUSL. Reproduced with permission of the PEB for the UCC. All rights reserved.

Prior uniform statutory provision. — None.

Purpose. — This section is designed to safeguard a person holding a right of action from any unintentional loss of rights by the ill-advised use of such terms as "cancellation", "rescission", or the like. Once a party's rights have accrued they are not to be lightly impaired by concessions made in business decency and without intention to forego them. Therefore, unless the cancellation of a contract expressly declares that it is "without reservation of rights", or the like, it cannot be considered to be a renunciation under this section.

Cross reference. — Section 1-107.

"Cancellation". Section 2-106.

"Contract". Section 1-201.

Official source: NMOneSource (New Mexico Compilation Commission). Reproduced from public-domain New Mexico statutes; confirm against the official source for the current text. Not legal advice.