Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

NRS 104.2202

Final expression: Parol or extrinsic evidence

Known as the Uniform Commercial Code

The act spans §§ 104–104 (489 sections).

Applied in 7 court decisions — leading case Las Vegas Sands, LLC v. Nehme (2011)

Most recently applied in Galardi v. Naples Polaris, L.L.C. (May 2013)

(Added to NRS by 1965, 787; A 2005, 849; 2023, 3182)

How often courts cite this section

1987199020002010201320
citing decisions per year

Court decisions citing this, by year. The dip in the last several years is a data-coverage gap, not a real trend — our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so recent citations are undercounted.

Terms with respect to which the confirmatory memoranda of the parties agree or which are otherwise set forth in a record intended by the parties as a final expression of their agreement with respect to such terms as are included therein may not be contradicted by evidence of any prior agreement or of a contemporaneous oral agreement but may be explained or supplemented:

1. By course of performance, course of dealing or usage of trade (NRS 104.1303); and

2. By evidence of consistent additional terms unless the court finds the record to have been intended also as a complete and exclusive statement of the terms of the agreement.

Official source: Nevada Legislature. Reproduced from public-domain Nevada statutes; confirm against the official source for the current text. Not legal advice.