2. The limitation of the rules in subsection 1 to transactions other than consumer transactions leaves to the court the determination of the proper rules in consumer transactions. The court may not infer from that limitation the nature of the proper rule in consumer transactions and may continue to apply established approaches.
NRS 104.9626
Action in which deficiency or surplus is in issue
Known as the Uniform Commercial Code
The act spans §§ 104–104 (489 sections).
Applied in 2 court decisions — leading case Fry v. Dinan (In Re Dinan) (2010)
Most recently applied in CASTILLO VS. UNITED FED. CREDIT UNION (February 2018)
(Added to NRS by 1999, 360)
Official source: Nevada Legislature. Reproduced from public-domain Nevada statutes; confirm against the official source for the current text. Not legal advice.