Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

NRS 104A.4212

Liability and duty of receiving bank regarding unaccepted payment order

Applied in 1 court decision — leading case Lombino v. Bank of America, N.A. (2011)

Most recently applied in Lombino v. Bank of America, N.A. (June 2011)

(Added to NRS by 1991, 439)

If a receiving bank fails to accept a payment order that it is obliged by express agreement to accept, the bank is liable for breach of the agreement to the extent provided in the agreement or in this article, but does not otherwise have any duty to accept a payment order or, before acceptance, to take any action, or refrain from taking action, with respect to the order except as provided in this article or by express agreement. Liability based on acceptance arises only when acceptance occurs as stated in NRS 104A.4209, and liability is limited to that provided in this article. A receiving bank is not the agent of the sender or beneficiary of the payment order it accepts, or of any other party to the funds transfer, and the bank owes no duty to any party to the funds transfer except as otherwise provided in this article or by express agreement.

Official source: Nevada Legislature. Reproduced from public-domain Nevada statutes; confirm against the official source for the current text. Not legal advice.