Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

NRS 11.130

Premises actually occupied under claim of title deemed to be held adversely

Applied in 1 court decision — leading case 664 F. Supp. 2d 1174 - Dayton Valley Investors, LLC v. Union Pacific Railroad (2009)

Most recently applied in 664 F. Supp. 2d 1174 - Dayton Valley Investors, LLC v. Union Pacific Railroad (October 2009)

[1911 CPA § 16; RL § 4958; NCL § 8515]

Where it appears that there has been an actual continued occupation of premises, under a claim of title, exclusive of any other right, but not founded upon a written instrument, or a judgment or decree, the premises so actually occupied, and no other, shall be deemed to have been held adversely.

Official source: Nevada Legislature. Reproduced from public-domain Nevada statutes; confirm against the official source for the current text. Not legal advice.