Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

NRS 11.259

Effect of compliance with or failure to comply with NRS 11.258

Applied in 6 court decisions — leading case Otak Nevada, LLC v. Eighth Judicial District Court Ex Rel. County of Clark (2011)

Most recently applied in 141 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 62 - BAGELMANIA HOLDINGS, LLC v. RDH INTERESTS, INC. C/W 87901 (December 2025)

(Added to NRS by 2007, 648)

How often courts cite this section

20112020202520
citing decisions per year

Court decisions citing this, by year. The dip in the last several years is a data-coverage gap, not a real trend — our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so recent citations are undercounted.

.

1. The court shall dismiss an action involving nonresidential construction if the attorney for the complainant fails to:

(a) File an affidavit required pursuant to NRS 11.258;

(b) File a report required pursuant to subsection 3 of NRS 11.258; or

(c) Name the expert consulted in the affidavit required pursuant to subsection 1 of NRS 11.258.

2. The fact that an attorney for a complainant has complied or failed to comply with the provisions of NRS 11.256 to 11.259, inclusive, is admissible in the action.

Official source: Nevada Legislature. Reproduced from public-domain Nevada statutes; confirm against the official source for the current text. Not legal advice.