Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

NRS 112.160

Insolvency

Known as the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act

The act spans §§ 112–112 (12 sections).

Applied in 4 court decisions — leading case Sportsco Enterprises v. Morris (1996)

Most recently applied in WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. VS. RADECKI (September 2018)

(Added to NRS by 1987, 10)

How often courts cite this section

199620002010201820
citing decisions per year

Court decisions citing this, by year. The dip in the last several years is a data-coverage gap, not a real trend — our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so recent citations are undercounted.

1. A debtor is insolvent if the sum of the debtor’s debts is greater than all of the debtor’s assets at a fair valuation.

2. A debtor who is generally not paying his or her debts as they become due is presumed to be insolvent.

3. A partnership is insolvent under subsection 1 if the sum of the partnership’s debts is greater than the aggregate, at a fair valuation, of all of the partnership’s assets and the sum of the excess of the value of each general partner’s nonpartnership assets over the partner’s nonpartnership debts.

4. Assets under this section do not include property that has been transferred, concealed or removed with intent to hinder, delay or defraud creditors or that has been transferred in a manner making the transfer voidable under this chapter.

5. Debts under this section do not include an obligation to the extent it is secured by a valid lien on property of the debtor not included as an asset.

Official source: Nevada Legislature. Reproduced from public-domain Nevada statutes; confirm against the official source for the current text. Not legal advice.