Provision for support
Applied in 3 court decisions — leading case Ambrose v. First National Bank of Nevada (1971)
Most recently applied in KLABACKA VS. NELSON C/W 66772 (May 2017)
[Part 5:86:1939; 1931 NCL § 6880.04]
Court decisions citing this, by year. The dip in the last several years is a data-coverage gap, not a real trend — our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so recent citations are undercounted.
1. Provision for the beneficiary will be for the support, education, maintenance and benefit of the beneficiary alone, and without reference to or limitation by the beneficiary’s needs, station in life, or mode of life, or the needs of any other person, whether dependent upon the beneficiary or not.
2. The existence of a spendthrift trust does not depend on the character, capacity, incapacity, competency or incompetency of the beneficiary.
Official source: Nevada Legislature. Reproduced from public-domain Nevada statutes; confirm against the official source for the current text. Not legal advice.