Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

NRS 172.145

Defendant entitled to submit statement regarding preliminary hearing which grand jury must receive; grand jury required to hear and district attorney required to submit known evidence which will explain away charge; invitations and issuance of process for witnesses

Applied in 28 court decisions — leading case Kirksey v. State (1996)

Most recently applied in CHASING HORSE (NATHAN) v. DIST. CT. (STATE) (September 2024)

(Added to NRS by 1967, 1409; A 1985, 555; 2011, 287)

How often courts cite this section

196819801990200020102020202430
citing decisions per year

Court decisions citing this, by year. The dip in the last several years is a data-coverage gap, not a real trend — our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so recent citations are undercounted.

1. The grand jury is not bound to hear evidence for the defendant, except that the defendant is entitled to submit a statement which the grand jury must receive providing whether a preliminary hearing was held concerning the matter and, if so, that the evidence presented at the preliminary hearing was considered insufficient to warrant holding the defendant for trial. It is their duty, however, to weigh all evidence submitted to them, and when they have reason to believe that other evidence within their reach will explain away the charge, they shall order that evidence to be produced, and for that purpose may require the district attorney to issue process for the witnesses.

2. If the district attorney is aware of any evidence which will explain away the charge, the district attorney shall submit it to the grand jury.

3. The grand jury may invite any person, without process, to appear before the grand jury to testify.

Official source: Nevada Legislature. Reproduced from public-domain Nevada statutes; confirm against the official source for the current text. Not legal advice.