Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

NRS 199.490

Overt act not necessary

Applied in 12 court decisions — leading case United States v. Cornelio-Pena (2006)

Most recently applied in Villavicencio v. Sessions (January 2018)

[1911 C&P § 113; RL § 6378; NCL § 10062]

How often courts cite this section

1981199020002010201840
citing decisions per year

Court decisions citing this, by year. The dip in the last several years is a data-coverage gap, not a real trend — our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so recent citations are undercounted.

In any such proceeding for violation of NRS 199.480, it shall not be necessary to prove that any overt act was done in pursuance of such unlawful conspiracy or combination.

Official source: Nevada Legislature. Reproduced from public-domain Nevada statutes; confirm against the official source for the current text. Not legal advice.