The Secretary of State’s authenticated file stamp on the original of the final draft or revision of a regulation raises a rebuttable presumption that the regulation was adopted and filed in compliance with all requirements necessary to make it effective.
NRS 233B.090
Rebuttable presumption of regularity of adoption and filing of regulation
Known as the Nevada Administrative Procedure Act
The act spans §§ 233–233 (66 sections).
Applied in 4 court decisions — leading case Department of Industrial Relations v. Circus Circus Enterprises, Inc. (1985)
Most recently applied in THE NEVADA INDEP. v. WHITLEY (March 2022)
(Added to NRS by 1965, 965; A 1977, 1549)
How often courts cite this section
Court decisions citing this, by year. The dip in the last several years is a data-coverage gap, not a real trend — our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so recent citations are undercounted.
Official source: Nevada Legislature. Reproduced from public-domain Nevada statutes; confirm against the official source for the current text. Not legal advice.