Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

NRS 268.668

Order of district court staying proceeding for annexation or detachment; annulment of annexation

Applied in 5 court decisions — leading case Citizens for Cold Springs v. City of Reno (2009)

Most recently applied in 142 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 10 - GOLD STANDARD VENTURES (US) INC. v. THORSON, P.E. (February 2026)

(Added to NRS by 1967, 1626)

How often courts cite this section

197619801990200020102020202610
citing decisions per year

Court decisions citing this, by year. The dip in the last several years is a data-coverage gap, not a real trend — our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so recent citations are undercounted.

At any stage of an annexation or detachment proceeding, or within 90 days from the date of its completion as provided in NRS 268.658 or 268.664, any person or city claiming to be adversely affected by such proceeding may apply to the district court having jurisdiction of the territory proposed to be annexed for an order staying such proceeding or annulling such completed action. The court may accord such application precedence over any civil business not involving the public interest. In hearing and deciding on such application, the court shall consider any evidence or statements introduced at any administrative or legislative hearing and any evidence which it finds to have been arbitrarily or capriciously excluded. If the court finds that any of the steps required by NRS 268.610 to 268.671, inclusive, have not been duly taken or that any officer or body has abused its discretion in taking any action, the court shall make such temporary or final order in the premises as the ends of justice may require.

Official source: Nevada Legislature. Reproduced from public-domain Nevada statutes; confirm against the official source for the current text. Not legal advice.