In judicial districts where more than one judge has been provided for, the judges have concurrent and coextensive jurisdiction within the district, under such rules as may be prescribed by law, and the district judges therein may make additional rules, not inconsistent with law, which will enable them to transact judicial business in a convenient and lawful manner.
NRS 3.020
Judicial districts with more than one judge: Concurrent jurisdiction of judges
Applied in 2 court decisions — leading case Halverson v. Hardcastle (2007)
Most recently applied in Halverson v. Hardcastle (July 2007)
[2:440:1955]—(NRS A 1981, 1954)
Official source: Nevada Legislature. Reproduced from public-domain Nevada statutes; confirm against the official source for the current text. Not legal advice.