Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

NRS 47.040

Rulings on evidence: Effect of error

Applied in 41 court decisions — leading case Edwards v. State (1974)

Most recently applied in Lopez v. Lopez (November 2023)

(Added to NRS by 1971, 775)

How often courts cite this section

197219801990200020102020202350
citing decisions per year

Court decisions citing this, by year. The dip in the last several years is a data-coverage gap, not a real trend — our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so recent citations are undercounted.

1. Except as otherwise provided in subsection 2, error may not be predicated upon a ruling which admits or excludes evidence unless a substantial right of the party is affected, and:

(a) In case the ruling is one admitting evidence, a timely objection or motion to strike appears of record, stating the specific ground of objection.

(b) In case the ruling is one excluding evidence, the substance of the evidence was made known to the judge by offer or was apparent from the context within which questions were asked.

2. This section does not preclude taking notice of plain errors affecting substantial rights although they were not brought to the attention of the judge.

Official source: Nevada Legislature. Reproduced from public-domain Nevada statutes; confirm against the official source for the current text. Not legal advice.