NRS 482.36363

Hearings: Burden of proof; consideration of economic effect

Applied in 2 court decisions — leading case 163 Ill. 2d 462 - Fields Jeep-Eagle, Inc. v. Chrysler Corp. (1994)

Most recently applied in Chrysler Group LLC v. Fox Hills Motor Sales, Inc. (January 2015)

(Added to NRS by 1981, 701; A 1999, 2510)

1. In any hearing on a protest filed pursuant to NRS 482.36352, 482.36354 or 482.36357, the manufacturer or distributor has the burden of proof to establish that there is good cause to terminate, refuse to continue, modify or replace a franchise, or to establish an additional dealership or relocate an existing dealership.

2. In any hearing on a protest filed pursuant to NRS 482.36357, the Director shall consider the economic effect of the proposed action upon the protesting dealer.

Official source: Nevada Legislature. Reproduced from public-domain Nevada statutes; confirm against the official source for the current text. Not legal advice.