No privilege exists under NRS 49.335 or 49.345 if the identity of the informer or the informer’s interest in the subject matter of his or her communication has been disclosed by a holder of the privilege or by the informer’s own action, or if the informer appears as a witness.
NRS 49.355
Voluntary disclosure; informer a witness
Applied in 1 court decision — leading case State v. Stiglitz (1978)
Most recently applied in State v. Stiglitz (April 1978)
(Added to NRS by 1971, 787)
Official source: Nevada Legislature. Reproduced from public-domain Nevada statutes; confirm against the official source for the current text. Not legal advice.