In any prosecution for sexual assault, expert testimony is not inadmissible to show that the victim’s behavior or mental or physical condition is consistent with the behavior or condition of a victim of sexual assault.
NRS 50.345
Expert testimony to show victim’s behavior or condition is consistent with behavior or condition of victim of sexual assault
Known as the Uniform Child Witness Testimony by Alternative Methods Act
The act spans §§ 50–50 (64 sections).
Applied in 7 court decisions — leading case Lickey v. State (1992)
Most recently applied in Theil (Brett) Vs. State (February 2021)
(Added to NRS by 1985, 843)
How often courts cite this section
Court decisions citing this, by year. The dip in the last several years is a data-coverage gap, not a real trend — our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so recent citations are undercounted.
Official source: Nevada Legislature. Reproduced from public-domain Nevada statutes; confirm against the official source for the current text. Not legal advice.