Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

NRS 517.110

Certificate of location: Recording; contents; effect of insufficiency

Applied in 2 court decisions — leading case 556 F. Supp. 444 - Mendenhall v. United States (1982)

Most recently applied in 556 F. Supp. 444 - Mendenhall v. United States (December 1982)

[Part 14:89:1897; A 1899, 93; C § 221; RL § 2435; NCL § 4133]—(NRS A 1971, 2201; 1983, 1611; 1985, 1499)

1. When the locator files his or her maps pursuant to NRS 517.100, the locator shall present to the county recorder for recording, together with the usual recording fees, duplicate certificates of location which state:

(a) The name of the claim, designating it as a placer claim.

(b) The name of the locator and the locator’s mailing address.

(c) The date of location.

(d) The number of feet or acres claimed.

2. This certificate, or the record thereof, or a certified copy of the record is prima facie evidence of the recitals therein.

3. If the certificate does not state all the facts required by this section to be stated, it is void.

Official source: Nevada Legislature. Reproduced from public-domain Nevada statutes; confirm against the official source for the current text. Not legal advice.