Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

NRS 612.395

Unemployment as result of labor dispute

Known as the Unemployment Compensation Law

The act spans §§ 612–612 (213 sections).

Applied in 3 court decisions — leading case Airport Casino, Inc. v. Jones (1987)

Most recently applied in Four Queens, Inc. v. Board of Review of Nevada Employment Security Department (February 1989)

[Part 5:129:1937; A 1939, 115; 1941, 412; 1943, 239; 1947, 413; 1949, 277; 1951, 339; 1955, 698]—(NRS A 1993, 1825)

How often courts cite this section

19771980198910
citing decisions per year

Court decisions citing this, by year. The dip in the last several years is a data-coverage gap, not a real trend — our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so recent citations are undercounted.

1. A person is disqualified for benefits for any week with respect to which the Administrator finds that the person’s total or partial unemployment is due to a labor dispute in active progress at the factory, establishment or other premises at which the person is or was last employed.

2. This section does not apply if it is shown to the satisfaction of the Administrator that:

(a) The person is not participating in or financing or directly interested in the labor dispute which caused his or her unemployment; and

(b) The person does not belong to a grade or class of workers of which, immediately before the commencement of the labor dispute, there were members employed at the premises at which the labor dispute occurs, any of whom are participating in or financing or directly interested in the labor dispute, but if in any case separate branches of work which are commonly conducted as separate businesses in separate premises are conducted in separate departments of the same premises, each such department shall, for the purposes of this section, be deemed to be a separate factory, establishment or other premises.

Official source: Nevada Legislature. Reproduced from public-domain Nevada statutes; confirm against the official source for the current text. Not legal advice.