Any finding of fact or law, judgment, determination, conclusion or final order made by the Administrator or an Appeal Tribunal, examiner, Board of Review, district court or any other person with the authority to make findings of fact or law pursuant to NRS 612.450 to 612.530, inclusive, is not admissible or binding in any separate or subsequent action or proceeding, between a person and that person’s present or previous employer brought before an arbitrator, court or judge of this State or the United States, regardless of whether the prior action was between the same or related parties or involved the same facts.
NRS 612.533
Introduction of certain evidence concerning claims for benefits prohibited in separate or subsequent proceeding
Known as the Unemployment Compensation Law
The act spans §§ 612–612 (213 sections).
Applied in 3 court decisions — leading case Britton v. City of North Las Vegas (1990)
Most recently applied in 907 F. Supp. 2d 1214 - Dannenbring v. Wynn Las Vegas, LLC (January 2013)
(Added to NRS by 1987, 151; A 1993, 1832)
How often courts cite this section
Court decisions citing this, by year. The dip in the last several years is a data-coverage gap, not a real trend — our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so recent citations are undercounted.
Official source: Nevada Legislature. Reproduced from public-domain Nevada statutes; confirm against the official source for the current text. Not legal advice.