Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

ORS 105.126

Applied in 2 court decisions — leading case Mehta v. Carson (2025)

Most recently applied in Mehta v. Carson (April 2025)

2001 c.596 §6 (105.123, 105.124 and 105.126 enacted in lieu of 105.125); 2003 c.378 §20; 2011 c.510 §4; 2025 c.356 §4

For a complaint described in ORS 105.123, if ORS chapter 90 does not apply to the premises:

(1) The complaint must be in substantially the following form and be available from the clerk of the court:

______________________________________________________________________________

_________

(Not covered by ORS chapter 90)

No. _____

(Landlord),

Plaintiff(s)

vs.

(Tenant),

Defendant(s)

1.

Defendant is in possession of the following premises:

__________________

__________________ (city)

2.

Defendant entered upon the premises with force or is unlawfully holding the premises with force.

3.

Plaintiff is entitled to possession of the premises, because:

_____ 24-hour notice for squatter. ORS

91.140.

_____ 30-day notice (month-to-month

tenancy)

_____ 30-day notice (cause)

_____ Notice to bona fide tenants after

foreclosure sale or termination of

fixed term tenancy after foreclosure

sale. ORS 86.782 (6)(c).

_____ Other notice (explain) ________

_____ No notice (explain) _________

Wherefore, plaintiff prays for possession of the premises, costs and disbursements and attorney fees, if applicable.

__________________

Plaintiff

______________________________________________________________________________

(2) A copy of the notice relied upon, if any, must be attached to the complaint.

Official source: Oregon State Legislature. Reproduced from public-domain Oregon statutes; confirm against the official source for the current text. Not legal advice.