Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

ORS 136.005

Known as the Uniform Act

The act spans §§ 136–136 (149 sections).

Applied in 7 court decisions — leading case State ex rel. Schrunk v. Walker (1989)

Most recently applied in 199 Or. App. 106 - Jury Service Resource Center v. Carson (April 2005)

1973 c.836 §222; 2001 c.779 §17

How often courts cite this section

198919902000200510
citing decisions per year

Court decisions citing this, by year. The dip in the last several years is a data-coverage gap, not a real trend — our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so recent citations are undercounted.

(1) The district attorney or the defendant in a criminal action may challenge the jury panel on the ground that there has been a material departure from the requirements of the law governing selection of jurors by filing a motion with the court supported by an affidavit alleging facts that, if true, constitute a material departure from the requirements of the law governing the selection of jurors. The party making the motion shall serve the motion and supporting affidavit on the other party, the trial court administrator and the State Court Administrator.

(2) A challenge to the panel shall be made before the voir dire examination of the jury.

(3) If the court determines that there has been a material departure from the requirements of the law governing selection of jurors, the court shall:

(a) Stay the proceedings pending the selection of a jury panel in conformity with the applicable provisions of law; and

(b) Grant such other relief as may be appropriate.

(4) The procedures prescribed by this section are the exclusive means by which a district attorney or defendant may challenge a jury panel.

Official source: Oregon State Legislature. Reproduced from public-domain Oregon statutes; confirm against the official source for the current text. Not legal advice.