Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

ORS 136.792

Known as the Uniform Act

The act spans §§ 136–136 (149 sections).

Applied in 7 court decisions — leading case 275 Or. App. 384 - State v. Zolotoff (2015)

Most recently applied in 329 Or. App. 588 - State v. Johnson (December 2023)

2005 c.463 §23

How often courts cite this section

200920102020202330
citing decisions per year

Court decisions citing this, by year. The dip in the last several years is a data-coverage gap, not a real trend — our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so recent citations are undercounted.

(1) For the purpose of imposing a new sentence in a case that has been remanded to a trial court that will result in resentencing for which a new sentence has not been imposed prior to July 7, 2005, the court may impanel a new jury to determine the enhancement facts as defined in ORS 136.760. Laws relating to impaneling a jury for a criminal trial apply to impaneling a jury under this section.

(2) ORS 136.785 (3) does not apply to a case in which the court has impaneled a new jury under this section. In a case with a jury impaneled under this section, an enhancement fact is not proven unless the number of jurors who find that the state has met its burden of proof with regard to the enhancement fact is equal to or greater than the number of jurors that was required to find the defendant guilty of the crime.

Official source: Oregon State Legislature. Reproduced from public-domain Oregon statutes; confirm against the official source for the current text. Not legal advice.