Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

ORS 183.540

Applied in 3 court decisions — leading case 237 Or. App. 628 - Oregon Cable Telecommunications Ass'n v. Department of Revenue (2010)

Most recently applied in 269 Or. App. 756 - Fick v. Oregon Department of Fish & Wildlife (March 2015)

1981 c.755 §4; 2003 c.749 §7; 2005 c.807 §6

How often courts cite this section

1985199020002010201510
citing decisions per year

Court decisions citing this, by year. The dip in the last several years is a data-coverage gap, not a real trend — our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so recent citations are undercounted.

If the statement of cost of compliance effect on small businesses required by ORS 183.335 (2)(b)(E) shows that a rule has a significant adverse effect upon small business, to the extent consistent with the public health and safety purpose of the rule, the agency shall reduce the economic impact of the rule on small business by:

(1) Establishing differing compliance or reporting requirements or time tables for small business;

(2) Clarifying, consolidating or simplifying the compliance and reporting requirements under the rule for small business;

(3) Utilizing objective criteria for standards;

(4) Exempting small businesses from any or all requirements of the rule; or

(5) Otherwise establishing less intrusive or less costly alternatives applicable to small business.

Official source: Oregon State Legislature. Reproduced from public-domain Oregon statutes; confirm against the official source for the current text. Not legal advice.