Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

ORS 321.259

Applied in 3 court decisions — leading case Prahar v. Department of Revenue (1995)

Most recently applied in 17 Or. Tax 124 - Department of Revenue v. Rankin (June 2003)

1993 c.801 §3; 2003 c.621 §2; 2017 c.315 §26

How often courts cite this section

19952000200310
citing decisions per year

Court decisions citing this, by year. The dip in the last several years is a data-coverage gap, not a real trend — our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so recent citations are undercounted.

The Legislative Assembly finds that:

(1) Multiple taxation through a yearly ad valorem levy on both trees and forestland managed in sustained yield timber operations discourages conservation, private ownership and investment of capital.

(2) The interests of this state, its residents and its future residents are best served by sustained yield practices and taxing policies that encourage production of forest resources for commerce, recreation and watersheds, stabilize employment levels, prevent large population shifts and encourage millage of timber products within Oregon.

(3) Timber on private lands managed on a sustained yield basis should be treated as a crop and not taxed as real property.

(4) Forestland should be taxed based on the value of the forestland in timber production.

Official source: Oregon State Legislature. Reproduced from public-domain Oregon statutes; confirm against the official source for the current text. Not legal advice.