ORS 34.105

Applied in 23 court decisions — leading case Barcik v. Kubiaczyk (1995)

Most recently applied in 321 Or. App. 250 - Marteeny v. Brown (August 2022)

1989 c.702 §2

How often courts cite this section

citing decisions per year

Court decisions citing this, by year. The dip in the last several years is a data-coverage gap, not a real trend — our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so recent citations are undercounted.

As used in ORS 34.105 to 34.240:

(1) “Adverse party” means a beneficially interested party to a judicial or administrative proceeding from which a mandamus proceeding arises, whose interests are adverse to the relator.

(2) “Counsel for defendant” means the attorney who appears on behalf of the defendant in a mandamus proceeding as provided in ORS 34.130 (4).

(3) “Defendant” means the court, corporation, board, officer or person against whom relief is sought in a mandamus proceeding.

(4) “Relator” means the beneficially interested party on whose relation a mandamus proceeding is brought.

Official source: Oregon State Legislature. Reproduced from public-domain Oregon statutes; confirm against the official source for the current text. Not legal advice.