Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

ORS 469.405

Known as the Oregon Residential Energy Conservation Act

The act spans §§ 469–469 (299 sections).

Applied in 3 court decisions — leading case Blue Mountain Alliance v. Energy Facility Siting Council (2013)

Most recently applied in Friends of Columbia Gorge v. Energy Fac. Siting Coun. (May 2021)

1995 c.505 §2; 1999 c.385 §5; 2025 c.305 §3

How often courts cite this section

20132020202110
citing decisions per year

Court decisions citing this, by year. The dip in the last several years is a data-coverage gap, not a real trend — our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so recent citations are undercounted.

(1) A site certificate may be amended with the approval of the Energy Facility Siting Council. The council may establish by rule the type of amendment that may be considered in a contested case proceeding. Notwithstanding ORS 183.482 and 183.484, judicial review of the council’s approval or rejection of a request for an amendment to a site certificate or decision related to or arising from a contested case on an amendment, regardless of whether a contested case was held prior to the council’s decision, is conferred solely on the Supreme Court. If a contested case is not held, only the certificate holder or persons who submitted comments on the request for an amendment in compliance with council rules may seek judicial review. A certificate holder or person who seeks judicial review is limited to the issues the certificate holder or the person raised in their comments.

(2) Notwithstanding ORS 34.020 or 197.825, or any other provision of law, the land use approval by an affected local government of a proposed amendment to a facility and the recommendation of the special advisory group of applicable substantive criteria shall be subject to judicial review only as provided in ORS 469.403. If the applicant elects to show compliance with the statewide planning goals by demonstrating that the facility has received local land use approval, the provisions of this section shall apply only to proposed projects for which the land use approval by the local government occurs after the date an application for amendment is submitted to the State Department of Energy.

(3) An amendment to a site certificate is not required for a pipeline less than 16 inches in diameter and less than five miles in length that is proposed to be constructed to test or maintain an underground gas storage reservoir. If the proposed pipeline will connect to a council certified surface facility related to an underground gas storage reservoir or to a council certified gas pipeline, whether the proposed pipeline is to be located inside or outside the site of a council certified facility, the certificate holder must obtain, prior to construction, the approval of the department for the construction, operation and retirement of the proposed pipeline. The department shall approve such a proposed pipeline if the pipeline meets applicable council substantive standards. Notwithstanding ORS 469.503 (3), the department may not review the proposed pipeline for compliance with other state standards. Notwithstanding ORS 469.503 (4), or any council rule addressing compliance with land use standards, the department shall not review such a proposed pipeline for compliance with land use requirements. Notwithstanding ORS 469.401 (3), the approval by the department of such pipeline shall not bind any state or local agency. The council may adopt appropriate procedural rules for the department review. The department shall issue an order approving or rejecting the proposed pipeline. Judicial review of a department order under this section shall be as provided in ORS 469.403.

(4) Subject to applicable rules adopted by the council, a person who holds a site certificate may request to add area to the approved site boundary without the council requiring an amendment to the site certificate.

Official source: Oregon State Legislature. Reproduced from public-domain Oregon statutes; confirm against the official source for the current text. Not legal advice.