When in a contested case a majority of the officials of the agency who are to render the final decision have not heard the case or reviewed the record, the decision, if adverse to a party to the proceeding other than the agency itself, shall not be made until a proposal for decision is served upon the parties, and an opportunity is afforded to each party adversely affected to file exceptions and present briefs and oral argument to the officials who are to render the decision. The proposal for decision shall contain a statement of the reasons therefor and of each issue of fact or law necessary to the proposed decision, prepared by the person who conducted the hearing or one who has read the record. The parties by written stipulation may waive compliance with this section.
S.C. Code Ann. § 1-23-340
Procedure in contested cases where majority of those who are to render final decision are unfamiliar with case
Applied in 1 court decision — leading case Al-Shabazz v. State (2000)
Most recently applied in Al-Shabazz v. State (February 2000)
1977 Act No. 176, Art
Official source: South Carolina Legislature. Reproduced from public-domain South Carolina statutes; confirm against the official source for the current text. Not legal advice.