Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

S.C. Code Ann. § 23-3-670

Cost of collection supplies for processing samples; processing fees

Known as the State Deoxyribonucleic Acid Identification Record Database Act

The act spans §§ 23–23 (14 sections).

Applied in 5 court decisions — leading case Eubanks v. South Carolina Department of Corrections (2009)

Most recently applied in State v. Scruggs (October 2015)

1994 Act No. 497, Part II, SECTION 131A; 2008 Act No. 413, SECTION 4.G, eff January 1, 2009.

How often courts cite this section

20072010201520
citing decisions per year

Court decisions citing this, by year. The dip in the last several years is a data-coverage gap, not a real trend — our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so recent citations are undercounted.

(A) The cost of collection supplies for processing a sample pursuant to this article must be paid by the general fund of the State. A person who is required to provide a sample pursuant to this article, upon conviction, pleading guilty or nolo contendere, or forfeiting bond, must pay a two hundred fifty dollar processing fee which may not be waived by the court. However:

(1) if the person is incarcerated, the fee must be paid before the person is paroled or released from confinement and may be garnished from wages the person earns while incarcerated; and

(2) if the person is not sentenced to a term of confinement, payment of the fee must be a condition of the person's sentence and may be paid in installments if so ordered by the court.

(B) The processing fee assessed pursuant to this section must be remitted to the general fund of the State and credited to the State Law Enforcement Division to offset the expenses SLED incurs in carrying out the provisions of this article.

Official source: South Carolina Legislature. Reproduced from public-domain South Carolina statutes; confirm against the official source for the current text. Not legal advice.