Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

S.C. Code Ann. § 57-5-140

State highways within municipalities

Applied in 3 court decisions — leading case Vaughan v. Town of Lyman (2006)

Most recently applied in Fickling v. City of Charleston (March 2007)

1962 Code SECTION 33-112; 1952 Code SECTION 33-112; 1951 (47) 457; 1969 (56) 154; 1993 Act No. 181, SECTION 1509.

How often courts cite this section

19912000200710
citing decisions per year

Court decisions citing this, by year. The dip in the last several years is a data-coverage gap, not a real trend — our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so recent citations are undercounted.

The state highways designated as parts of the state highway system shall include the sections of such highways lying within the limits of incorporated municipalities, and such sections shall be equally as eligible in all respects to receive the attention of the department for construction, reconstruction, and maintenance as are the sections of the highways lying wholly without incorporated places. But the department shall not share in the cost of any construction or improvement made by any municipality on any street or highway prior to the date the road or street so constructed or improved was added to the state highway system.

But nothing in this chapter shall prevent a municipality from undertaking any improvements or performing any maintenance work on state highways in addition to what the department is able to undertake with the available funds. The Department of Transportation shall not, however, be liable for damages to property or injuries to persons, as otherwise provided for in Section 15-78-10 et seq., as a consequence of the negligence by a municipality in such improvements or maintenance work by a municipality.

Official source: South Carolina Legislature. Reproduced from public-domain South Carolina statutes; confirm against the official source for the current text. Not legal advice.