Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

S.D. Codified Laws § 11-2-26

Continuance of nonconforming uses permitted--Discontinuance

Applied in 5 court decisions — leading case Kinzler v. Nacey (1980)

Most recently applied in Dakota Constructors, Inc. v. Hanson County Board of Adjustment (July 2023)

Source: SL 1941, ch 216, § 8; SDC Supp 1960, § 12.20A08; SL 1967, ch 20, § 12; SL 2000, ch 69, § 36.

How often courts cite this section

19801990200020102020202320
citing decisions per year

Court decisions citing this, by year. The dip in the last several years is a data-coverage gap, not a real trend — our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so recent citations are undercounted.

Any lawful use, lot, or occupancy of land or premises existing at the time of the adoption of the zoning ordinance may be continued, even though the use, lot, or occupation does not conform to the provisions of the ordinance. However, if the nonconforming use, lot, or occupancy is discontinued for a period of more than one year, any subsequent use, lot, or occupancy of the land or premises shall conform with the zoning ordinance.

Official source: South Dakota Legislature. Reproduced from public-domain South Dakota statutes; confirm against the official source for the current text. Not legal advice.