Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

S.D. Codified Laws § 15-20-1

Order to judgment debtor to appear and answer after execution returned unsatisfied

Applied in 3 court decisions — leading case Corbly v. Matheson (1983)

Most recently applied in First National Bank of Omaha v. Kolucek (May 2008)

Source: SDC 1939 & Supp 1960, § 33.2401.

How often courts cite this section

198319902000200810
citing decisions per year

Court decisions citing this, by year. The dip in the last several years is a data-coverage gap, not a real trend — our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so recent citations are undercounted.

When an execution upon a judgment for twenty-five dollars or more, exclusive of costs and disbursements, against property of the judgment debtor, or of any one of several debtors in the same judgment, issued to the sheriff of the county where such debtor resides or has a place of business, or if he does not reside in this state or has no place of business therein, to the sheriff of the county where such judgment was obtained, is returned unsatisfied in whole or in part, the judgment creditor at any time after such return is entitled to an order from a judge of the circuit court within the county to which the execution was issued, requiring such judgment debtor to appear and answer concerning his property before such judge, within such county, at a time and place specified in the order.

Official source: South Dakota Legislature. Reproduced from public-domain South Dakota statutes; confirm against the official source for the current text. Not legal advice.